Did Daniel Pearl Stumble Upon ISI Secrets?

by Siddharth Varadarajan
The Times of India
March 12, 2002


ISLAMABAD: What did General Pervez Musharraf mean when he said that Daniel Pearl-the Wall Street Journal correspondent who was kidnapped and killed by extremists in Pakistan-had been over intrusive in areas he shouldn't have been?

The remark was vintage Musharraf, delivered off-the-cuff during an impromptu press conference here Thursday. And though there was no trace of menace in his voice, he was clearly stating that there were some areas which journalists should stay away from for their own good. "Unfortunately", he said, "(Pearl) got over-involved". But what exactly had Pearl got himself "over-involved" in? Though he was said to be working on a story about the Pakistani linkages of Richard Reid-the shoe bomber who was overpowered by passengers on a US-bound flight in December-many local journalists feel Pearl had stumbled across information which might have embarrassed the Inter-Services Intelligence agency in some way.

"We can only presume he came close to finding out the roots of some people with the ISI," said a senior columnist for the Urdu daily, Jang . "There were 3,000 western journalists who worked in or passed through Pakistan during the US war on Afghanistan, said one editor of a daily newspaper. "Why was he the one picked up?"

The editor echoed a theory which is quite popular among journalists here "that Pearl might have been pursuing another, more damaging story than the one on Richard Reid: "It is possible he had come across some information about a few of the persons on India's list of 20 terrorists. Persons such as Dawood Ibrahim, for example".

He pointed out that the first time an expose on Dawood's Karachi links was published in the Pakistani magazine Herald , the ISI had picked up and interrogated two journalists, Ghulam Hasnain and Amir Ahmed Khan, to try and find out the source of their story.

Though Pakistani analysts doubt that Pearl kidnapping had official sanction, they say the investigation will likely proceed "cautiously". "I am not saying there will be a cover-up", said one senior journalist. "But Pakistan's past policies (regarding the extremist groups) have left a large number of skeletons. Once you begin investigating, you will start opening all kinds of doors".

Even though they had nothing to do with Pearl's kidnapping, many people within the ruling establishment would not like matters to be probed very deeply, he said. One noted Pakistani commentator told The Times of India that the manner in which Omar Sheikh, the prime suspect in the Pearl kidnapping, came into police custody itself spoke of these linkages.

"He wasn't arrested. Rather, he turned himself in to the one man he trusted enormously, Punjab Home Secretary Brigadier Ijaz Shah, who is a retired ISI man".

And what was Omar's connection with Ijaz Shah? "Please re-read the diary Omar Sheikh wrote when he was in prison in India. It is full of adulatory references to the man who inspired him. And that man's name was Shah sahab."


Copyright 2002 The Times of India. Bennett, Coleman & Co Ltd

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.